This morning, my hometown newspaper’s lead story was about a rally downtown run by the Catholic Church in opposition to the Health-care Reform Law, known more commonly and derisively as “ObamaCare”. Upon glancing at the story, I was initially confused why a staunchly middle class group would be so upset about a law that would be a tremendous boon to the rank-and-file members of their congregation. The answer was obvious. It seems they are strongly opposed to a law that forces them to offer health insurance that would pay for such forbidden items as contraception and abortion. Oh, there’s something else, too. The Catholic Church is the world’s first Big Business, and it seems Big Business has a major bug up its bum about health insurance reform.
As I was browsing the Internet a little while later (I really was doing important research, I swear), an ad popped up on the top of the screen. It showed a picture of a nice friendly lady doctor talking to a little girl. The headline was: “Don’t let government come between you and your doctor.” It was sponsored by the family-friendly sounding “Concerned Women for American Legislative Action Committee”. I scanned the webpage thoroughly, but couldn’t find a list of names for this concerned group of women. I thought this odd, since in my years of experience I have yet to encounter a concerned woman who was afraid of mentioning her own name in connection with her cause. The group did provide its Washington, DC, address.
Turns out this “group of concerned women” are opposed to the Health-care Reform Law. What a surprise! They were pretty vague on just how this law would inject the government between you and your doctor, but they swear it is so, despite their complete lack of specific references (trust us, we know?). I looked up the address, and it belongs to a female doctor. But the doctor’s office, for her medical practice that is, was located in nearby Virginia. Not sure why she had an office in DC where all the insurance industry lobbyists have offices, maybe it’s just a coincidence.
Wouldn’t it be refreshing if Big Business would just come out and say that they are opposed to health care reform because it will cost them money? Well, that’s not true, because businesses always pass along any increases in costs to consumers, or they soon go out of business. The law would, however, increase costs to the people who OWN Big Businesses. Yep, someone has to pay. In this case, it’s the people who can afford to pay.
I also came across the following article in the Christian Science Monitor. Now I’m generally skeptical about anything published anywhere, especially if there is some group with an ax to grind behind it, but the CSM is generally noted for its journalistic integrity, and is viewed as a fairly unbiased publication. This article details some important aspects of the health-care reform law:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0321/Health-care-reform-bill-101-Who-will-pay-for-reform
So, wealthy people are opposed to paying more taxes…yes, everyone is opposed to paying more taxes. However, if one is a wealthy American, one must remember the reason that they are wealthy: America makes becoming wealthy, and staying wealthy, easier than in many other parts of the world. Perhaps they should be more willing to accept some additional costs to offset their massive blessings. Just a thought.
What I find truly insidious is this tactic of Divide-and-Conquer. Let’s get the Catholics to oppose health-care reform because of contraceptives (By the way, if you are a devout Catholic, it really shouldn’t matter if contraception is available, you can always follow the Church doctrine and refuse to use it). Let’s get mothers worried (without justification) that health-care reform will somehow put the government in-between you and your doctor. The list goes on. The tactic is downright sneaky, and sneaky bothers me.
Facts, however, delight me. The fact that the United States of America is the only major industrialized country without mandatory universal health care also bothers me. The fact that millions of uninsured Americans have to use hospital emergency rooms as their primary care physician bothers me, because it increases health care costs for everyone else, and doesn’t begin to provide the kind of health care that is really necessary for good health.
What really bothers me most of all is greed. Now maximizing your own personal wealth is basically a sound idea. I have no real problem with it, unless you have to make someone else truly suffer in order for you to be well off. But if you think that making everyone else worse off will make you better off, then that’s greed, and it is wrong. It is wrong morally (not that many people care about morality these days), and it is wrong economically. American prosperity was based on the rising wealth of the middle class. Good jobs, providing a living wage for working people, led to vast economic expansion in the last half of the 20th century. It even allowed rich people to get richer. Apparently, they don’t think they’re rich enough.
I could go on about greed, and the excesses that the truly greedy will use to protect their wealth. But I need to step off my soapbox and get some work done. Sorry if I offended anyone, unless you’re greedy, or sneaky, or both. Then you should really do some self-examination and try to figure out if what you are doing is right for you, and for the rest of the world.