Prince William's Job

There are rumors going around that Britain’s Prince William may soon be out of a job. No not that job, the UK is not doing away with its monarchy and young William remains second in line for the throne, after his father and grandmother, the Queen. However, William’s present job as a pilot for the Royal Air Force’s search-and-rescue helicopter service is supposedly being farmed out to an American-based private company in an effort to save the government some money. I’m not sure I like the idea.

I’m not a die hard Anglophile and I don’t really care one way or another about the British Royal Family. Prince William seems to be a very nice young man, with a pretty wife and a child on the way. As far as employment opportunities, I think it’s safe to say that the Prince will have enough on his plate to keep him busy for the rest of his life. There is also little chance of his family going hungry any time soon. What bothers me is privatizing a service such as a helicopter search-and-rescue group. You see there really are jobs that are best performed by a government, where profitability is not the chief concern.

Suppose you are fortunate enough to be boating off the coast of England when a nasty storm comes up and capsizes your little craft. A private company is tasked with rescuing your incompetent (or just unlucky) butt from the frigid water, but determines that the storm is too dangerous to fly into because the corporate office has estimated that there is a significant enough probability that they might lose a multimillion-dollar aircraft. Your sorry ass just isn’t worth the risk. But suppose you then radio the rescue pilot and inform him that your sailing companion that day is none other than Donald Trump, who has guaranteed that he will cover any potential financial loss to the company. Is the rescue then attempted on that basis? Doesn’t really seem right does it?

“Privatization” is a popular buzzword these days and the concept is seen as a viable alternative to the ever-increasing size of government. There are many areas that the government could extract itself from and save the taxpayers some money, but there are other areas where it really isn’t a good idea. Imagine that you’ve taken a temporary assignment in a foreign country with a history of political unrest. One day a protest group devolves into a riotous mob and one of the targets of their hatred du jour is any American (including you). You flee as the angry mob approaches, running down an alley where you trip and fall, tearing your jeans and scraping your knees. Turning the corner, you sprint toward the safety of the American Embassy, which is just a block away. You are tattered and bloody, but safety is just steps away.

When you arrive at the gate, who is it that you want to be standing guard? I say please let me see a U.S. Marine, well-trained, well-equipped, and steeped in a tradition of duty and service to his country; a protector to whom the concept of being a fellow American really means something. What if instead you found a private security guard that had witnessed the approach of the dangerous looking mob behind you and decided that the corporation that he works for really didn’t pay him enough to take that risk, and locked you out? I don’t know about you, but I really don’t like the idea of trusting my life to a rent-a-cop.

Let’s say you don’t boat and don’t travel. You may think my examples are a bit too far-fetched to matter to a hard-working, self-reliant type like you. Well then how about if your granny (or any sweet little old lady that you know) lives in a city where much of its public services have been privatized and farmed out to for-profit companies. Now Granny gets a bit confused these days, and she forgets to pay the invoice for her monthly fire-protection plan that she received from Fire Protection Company, Inc. Of course, the worst thing happens and Granny’s scented candle burns down and catches the curtains on fire. In moments, the house is engulfed in a fiery conflagration, and dear sweet Granny is trapped inside. She is lucid enough to call for help (hopefully the 9-1-1 service wasn’t eliminated in the budget cuts), and the fire truck arrives in moments to rescue the poor thing. But wait, they receive a call from the home office. Seems the resident of that particular house isn’t paid up. Sorry lady, no rescue today. We gotta let it burn. Oh, by the way, we gotta let you burn, too. Think this an impossible example? It’s happened here in the good old U.S.A. (well, they haven’t let a granny burn to death…yet).

Governments have grown large and increasingly expensive, which is a problem. Yet there remain many areas that are better serviced by a tax-funded public organization than a privately-funded corporation. Being a “libertarian” doesn’t mean that you love freedom more than anyone else does, it just means that you’ve got some different ideas about how to run things that haven’t gained popularity, and perhaps shouldn’t. There are those people in our society, usually with wealth and power, who would have us believe that they have better solutions to the needs of our people than our more traditional ones. Personally, I’m all for new ideas or new technologies that can save us money. But let’s make sure that we think very carefully before we adopt any of those ideas. Oh by the way, our British cousins just may want to rethink getting rid of William’s current job, too. The RAF is probably better suited to saving lives than a company with a focus on the bottom line.

A Sea King helicopter

(Prince William's current ride)